West should reclaim parental sovereignty from the State

celebrate Family Reject Corrupt Society.

Let Families Raise Their Children:

A Cross-Cultural Reflection

Parenting is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. It is a role where one learns while on the job. Though the experience of ancestors often helps, every generation faces its own unique challenges, making each parental journey distinct. Parenting is serious business. It does not help when media mocks or trivializes it. It becomes a wake-up call when even foreign governments begin to ridicule the media doing this mockery. This is particularly evident now as Russia openly criticizes Western—especially American—media for eroding family values, or perhaps more precisely, for reflecting the lack of them.

On careful examination, a critical lesson emerges for the West: the balance between state and family in shaping future generations demands urgent reflection. True prosperity goes far beyond material accumulation. It includes a nation’s ability to cultivate human potential, foster self-reliance, and maintain a resilient social fabric. This final “yellow rose” is a direct appeal, born from India’s contrasting experience, to our Western counterparts: please let parents do their job, as governments have arguably faltered.

Parenting in India

In India, despite myriad challenges, the bedrock of human capital formation remains the family unit. Driven by aspiration and deeply rooted cultural values, Indian parents take primary responsibility for raising, disciplining, and educating their children. This foundational social contract remains largely free from pervasive state intervention in parenting. Parents instill ambition, demand academic excellence, enforce discipline, and guide their children toward productive lives.

This family-led cultivation of human potential is a continuous, self-propelling engine—producing generations of resilient, resourceful, and globally competitive individuals. The state typically intervenes only in cases of clear danger, neglect, or crime, thereby respecting the family’s fundamental autonomy in day-to-day upbringing.

Parenting in the West

Contrast this with the trajectory in many Western societies. Often with benevolent intentions, governments have expanded their mandate into the minutiae of child-rearing. Child protection services, social work agencies, and educational institutions are vital for safeguarding the vulnerable. However, they have collectively created an environment of pervasive oversight and, at times, intrusive scrutiny over parental decisions.

Disciplinary practices, moral guidance, and even definitions of appropriate upbringing are increasingly shaped by bureaucratic norms and state-appointed experts—individuals who may lack the nuanced understanding of specific family dynamics or the lived realities of parenting.

The unintended consequences of this overreach subtly erode human capital by undermining parental authority. The result? Less discipline, weaker life skills in children, and rising confusion in youth. More concerning is how this environment makes many parents feel compelled to prioritize avoiding legal or institutional trouble over directly guiding or disciplining their children. In effect, the state begins parenting, while parents retreat into caution.

The Media’s Role: Undermining the Family Ideal

Compounding this problem is the influence of popular media, especially Hollywood and Western television, which has steadily eroded the image of the family as a nurturing, disciplined, and resilient unit. Very few reputable films or television series today portray parenting in a dignified or aspirational light. Instead, fathers are often depicted as foolish or absent, mothers as overwhelmed or neurotic, and family structures as fractured by default. Married couples are rare; divorce, dysfunction, and casual relationships dominate the narrative landscape.

Across multiple spin-offs of CSI, there is not a single functional marriage portrayed among the core characters. In House M.D., the brilliant but misanthropic doctor treats family ties as liabilities. In NCIS, the lead character often mocks marriage and actively avoids emotional connection. The Good Wife—despite its title—depicts a crumbling marriage marred by adultery, a toxic mother-in-law, a manipulative mother, and a son who, after admission in college, runs away to Paris with an older woman, abandoning his family altogether and wasting hard earned tuition fee deposited by mother. List of such negative TV shows is endless.

This cultural messaging matters. It subtly rewires public expectations—especially in younger generations—about what is “normal” or “desirable.” When nearly every on-screen family is broken, chaotic, or mocked, real families feel less confident, less supported, and more uncertain in their roles. Media no longer reflects social reality—it reshapes it, often in ways that devalue stability, patience, and generational responsibility. In this way, the cultural ecosystem itself becomes hostile to effective parenting.

This cultural collapse has been explored in “Hollywood may follow down the cliff after Urdu cinema (Bollywood),” which provides a broader reflection on how glamorized decay can corrode social values over time.

The Loss of Unconventional Brilliance

Crucially, the very children who are often labeled as “delinquent” or “rebellious” are frequently among the brightest and most intelligent. Their non-conformity may not stem from misbehavior but from boredom with outdated systems, frustration with perceived inefficiencies, or from neuro-divergent minds that struggle within rigid educational and social molds.

Consider historical figures like Albert Einstein or modern innovators like Elon Musk, whose unconventional thinking may well have been stifled under today’s regimes of excessive oversight. State systems are often ill-equipped to nurture this brilliance. Instead of recognizing potential, they opt for quick labeling, disciplinary action, or exclusion.

This risks squandering the cream of society—the very individuals who might otherwise become innovators, problem-solvers, or visionary leaders. Losing them to apathy or alienation represents a tragic and irreparable loss of prime human capital.

A Humble Plea: Rebalancing the Relationship

The plea to the West is simple and sincere: Trust parents to do their job. Recognize the inherent capacity of families to nurture and guide their children—even those who challenge conventional norms. While safety nets and protection are absolutely necessary, broad, daily state intrusion into parenting undermines the one institution most capable of raising resilient, disciplined, and ambitious citizens.

Western societies may wish to begin reviewing policies that encroach on parental discretion. Fostering renewed trust in families—rather than trying to legislate over them—can help rediscover a powerful, organic source of national strength.

By stepping back and allowing families to reclaim their core responsibility, the West might reawaken a tradition of human-centered richness—one that no government program, however well-funded, can fully replicate.

Transforming thought transforms the life.

You Are Not Your Past, You Are Your Thoughts

How to transform life?

People love to label and judge but we ignore power of thought. Are we born good or bad? Some say we’re doomed by dark traits. But history and personal stories show something else. Humans can change in amazing ways. You’re not stuck with your genes or past mistakes. You can transform yourself.

This article dives into how people reinvent themselves. Negative traits like greed or anger aren’t fixed. They’re learned habits. You can unlearn them. We’ll explore how to make that shift happen.

Real-Life Turnarounds

History and modern times are full of people who flipped their lives. They went from struggle to purpose. Here are some examples.

Ancient Examples

  • Valmiki: Once a bandit named Ratnakara, he robbed travelers. A life-changing moment led him to change. He became a poet and wrote the epic Ramayana. His story shows redemption is possible.
  • Kalidasa: He started as a simple woodcutter. Some say he was uneducated. After a wake-up call, he studied hard. He became a legendary poet, like Shakespeare for ancient India.

Modern Examples

  • Sri Aurobindo: Educated in England, he first followed colonial ideas. Then he became a fiery Indian nationalist. A spiritual experience in prison changed him again. He became a yogi and philosopher, founding Integral Yoga.
  • Robert Downey Jr.: He battled drug addiction, which wrecked his career. Legal troubles piled up. But he got sober and made a huge comeback. Now he’s a top Hollywood star.
  • Danny Trejo: Known for tough-guy roles, he was once in and out of prison. While locked up, he found sobriety. He built a new life as an actor and advocate for others.
  • Charles Colson: A Nixon aide, he went to prison for Watergate. There, he found faith. After release, he started Prison Fellowship, a global ministry for prisoners.

These stories prove it. Your past doesn’t define you. You can change, no matter where you start.

How Transformation Happens

So, how do people pull off these changes? Every story is different, but patterns emerge. Some saw what changes them some didn’t. Yet they changed by changing the pattern of their life.

The Turning Point

Change often starts with a single moment. It could be hitting rock bottom. Or a sudden realization. Maybe a spiritual wake-up call. You decide: “Enough. I’m done with this path.” It’s not gradual. You stop being “the addict” or “the criminal.” You choose a new identity, like “sober” or “honest.”

Thinking Differently

Your thoughts shape your life. If you think you’re stuck, you are. But if you focus on who you want to be, things shift. Ignore old negative thoughts. Build new ones that match your goals. This mental switch is key.

Creating the Right Environment

Your surroundings matter. Here’s how to set yourself up for success:

  • Get Away from Triggers: Stay away from places or people tied to old habits.
  • Find Support: Hang out with people who cheer for your new path.
  • Learn and Grow: Dive into books, philosophies, or spiritual practices that inspire you.

Building New Habits

A decision isn’t enough. You need action. Replace old habits with new ones. It’s tough at first, but every step strengthens your new identity.

The Power of Thoughts

Thoughts aren’t just ideas. They have energy. They shape who you become.

Mark Twain knew this well. In The $30,000 Bequest, he wrote about how habits work wonders. Small actions, like waking up at 2 a.m. a few times, can turn into a habit. Even something as simple as daydreaming can grow. It becomes a luxury. You get lost in it. Soon, your dreams and real life mix so much you can’t tell them apart.

Twain’s point is clear. A small thought, like a daydream, can take over. If you keep thinking it, it becomes a habit. That habit shapes your character. Your thoughts create your reality.

Here’s the chain: Thought → Repetition → Habit → Character.

Staying on Track

Transformation is great, but staying changed is harder. Some people slip back after years. Old habits can seem tempting when memories fade.

Thoughts are like sparks in a lighter. They hold energy. If you add fuel, like attention or belief, they turn into actions—your karma. Long ago, we could only react to actions. Now we know better. The trick is to notice thoughts without acting on them. Watch them calmly, without getting caught up. Don’t give them energy. Let them pass.

Here’s how to master this:

  • You’re Not Your Thoughts: Thoughts come and go. You’re the one watching them. They’re not you.
  • Stay Detached: When an old thought pops up, don’t fight it. Just watch it. Don’t give it attention or energy. Let it fade away.

This observant approach stops old habits before they start. You choose which thoughts to follow. It may require practice. It may take time as often you will become ‘forgetful’ but be persistent and you would be a different person.

The Takeaway

Your past doesn’t own you. You can change. Your thoughts, habits, and environment shape who you become. Decide who you want to be. Chose right environment. Watch your thoughts without getting caught up in them.

You’re the author of your own story.

Desire and Impulse

Desire vs. Impulse for Sensation:
A Clear Distinction

Human motivation is shaped by two powerful forces: desire and impulse for sensation. While they may seem similar—both sparking a need to act—they stem from distinct origins, carry different intentions, and yield contrasting outcomes. Understanding these differences helps us make conscious choices aligned with deeper purpose rather than fleeting urges.

What Is Desire?

Desire is a thoughtful longing rooted in experience, imagination, or future-oriented goals. It reflects a meaningful pursuit of fulfillment, purpose, or lasting value.

  • Grounded in Meaning: Desire emerges from past experiences, memories, or a clear vision of what we seek, shaped by reflection or realistic expectations.
  • Guided by Anticipation: It involves expecting specific benefits or pleasures, informed by prior satisfaction or mental engagement.
  • Purposeful and Controllable: Desire drives deliberate actions, often aligned with personal growth, values, or long-term goals, and can be refined or redirected.

Example: Craving a favorite dish after recalling its comforting taste, pursuing a meaningful relationship inspired by past trust, or striving to learn a new skill for personal development.

What Is Impulse for Sensation?

Impulse for sensation, or sensation-seeking, is an immediate, reactive drive for novelty, thrill, or stimulation, often disregarding consequences or past experience.

  • Fueled by Curiosity or Restlessness: It prioritizes newness over predictable outcomes, driven by a need to escape routine or feel something immediate.
  • Less Focused on Meaning: The focus is on the experience itself—whether pleasure, distraction, or excitement—rather than a defined reward.
  • Potential for Risky Outcomes: Actions may lead to eccentric, compulsive, or even regrettable behaviors, as the goal is the thrill of novelty.

Example: Trying a forbidden activity out of curiosity, indulging in a sugary treat for a quick dopamine rush, or seeking drastic change without a clear outcome.

Comparison at a Glance

AspectDesireImpulse for Sensation
SourceExperience, imagination, or valuesCuriosity, restlessness, or physical craving
FocusMeaningful, anticipated outcomeNovelty or immediate experience
MotivationReflection, purpose, or personal growthEscape from boredom or instant gratification
ControlCan be channeled or elevatedOften compulsive, may override reason
ExampleBuilding a meaningful relationshipScrolling social media for a quick thrill
ConsequenceOften fulfilling and adaptiveMay lead to regret or emptiness

Conclusion

Distinguishing between desire and impulse for sensation offers insight into our motivations. Desire, anchored in meaning and reflection, fuels purposeful and fulfilling actions that align with our values. In contrast, impulse for sensation seeks immediate gratification, often leading to fleeting or regrettable outcomes if pursued mindlessly. By recognizing these forces, we can cultivate desires that elevate our lives while managing impulsive urges, aligning our actions with deeper intentions rather than momentary cravings.

Human nature: Does it justify disappointment?

Human Nature

Exploring Human Nature: The Good, The Bad, and The Hopeful

Why People Can Disappoint Us

It’s easy to feel let down by humanity when you see selfishness, greed, violence, and dishonesty. These traits show up in news headlines, history books, and sometimes even in our daily lives. For example, global wealth inequality is stark: in 2024, the richest 1% owned nearly half of the world’s wealth, while the bottom half scraped by with just 0.5%. Wars and conflicts, like those ongoing in Ukraine and Gaza, have caused over 200,000 deaths since 2022. Scams and fraud cost people billions annually—$8.8 billion in the U.S. alone in 2023. These numbers paint a grim picture, and it’s no wonder some feel humanity is a mess.

But this view misses half the story. Human nature isn’t just a parade of flaws; it’s a mix of dark and bright spots, shaped by biology, upbringing, and society. Let’s break it down with a clearer, less formal lens, backed by data and examples.

Are We Born Good or Bad?

Philosophers have argued about this for ages, and their ideas help us understand why we act the way we do. Some reflections:

  • Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) thought humans are naturally selfish, driven by fear and a craving for power. He saw life without strong rules as “nasty, brutish, and short,” pointing to the chaos of the English Civil War (1642–1651), where thousands died in power struggles.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) disagreed, saying people are born good and peaceful. He blamed society—especially inequality—for turning us selfish. In 1750s France, the top 10% owned 90% of the wealth, fueling his argument that society corrupts.
  • John Locke (1632–1704) took a middle road, suggesting we’re born as blank slates with natural rights to life and liberty. He believed society helps us resolve conflicts fairly, as seen in early democratic systems like England’s Parliament.
  • Aristotle (384–322 BCE) said we’re not born good or bad but learn morality through practice. His idea of “flourishing” through balanced, virtuous living influenced modern ethics.
  • Confucianism (from ancient China) sees humans as capable of goodness but needing discipline. Mencius (372–289 BCE) argued we have innate compassion, like when we instinctively want to help a struggling stranger.
  • Indian philosophies like Vedanta and Jainism focus on personal growth. Vedanta says our actions (karma) shape us, while Jainism’s strict non-violence (ahimsa) pushes for compassion toward all life—Jains avoid harming even insects.
  • J. Krishnamurti (1895–1986) said we’re trapped by mental “images” (like nationalism or ego) that cause division. He urged self-awareness to break free, pointing to how wars often stem from these divisions.

The takeaway? Human nature isn’t fixed as “good” or “evil.” It’s a spectrum, shaped by our choices and environment. For every selfish act, there’s potential for kindness, depending on how society nudges us.

The Psychology Behind Our Flaws

Let’s look at the traits that spark disappointment and their flip sides, with some hard data:

  • Selfishness and Greed: These can come from tough childhoods—studies show kids with absent parents are 20% more likely to develop anxiety-driven behaviors like hoarding. Greed also ties to our brain’s reward system: dopamine spikes when we gain stuff, explaining why 1 in 10 Americans show signs of compulsive shopping. But greed backfires—60% of compulsive spenders report stress and debt. On the flip side, altruism is natural too. Babies as young as 18 months show helping behaviors, and studies find 80% of people feel happier after volunteering.
  • Violence: Social Learning Theory says we learn aggression by watching others. Kids exposed to violent media are 25% more likely to act aggressively, per a 2020 study. Yet, therapies like Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) reduce anger in 70% of patients by teaching better emotional control.
  • Deception and Self-Deception: Lying takes brainpower—fMRI scans show the prefrontal cortex lights up when we lie, causing stress. About 60% of people lie at least once in a 10-minute conversation, often to avoid conflict. Self-deception, like denying a bad habit, helps us cope but can distort reality—think of smokers ignoring cancer risks. Honesty, though, builds trust: couples who practice open communication report 30% higher relationship satisfaction.

These traits aren’t set in stone. Therapies, education, and social norms can shift us toward better behaviors.

How Society Shapes Us

Our flaws don’t just come from inside—they’re amplified by the world around us:

  • Conflict and Inequality: Karl Marx’s conflict theory says society pits the rich against the poor. In 2023, the top 1% in the U.S. earned 20 times more than the bottom 90%, fueling unrest like the 2020 U.S. protests, where 10,000 arrests followed demands for racial and economic justice. Inequality also hurts health—poorer Americans live 10–15 years less than the wealthy.
  • Historical Failures: Greed and deception have tanked societies. The Roman Empire fell partly due to corrupt elites hoarding wealth, while Easter Island’s collapse came from overcutting trees, leaving no resources by 1722. Nazi propaganda in the 1930s deceived millions, leading to 6 million Holocaust deaths.
  • The Bright Side: Humans also shine through cooperation. The Red Cross, founded in 1863, has helped millions in crises. Smallpox was eradicated in 1980 through global teamwork, saving 5 million lives yearly. Since 2000, global poverty dropped from 36% to 9%, thanks to international aid and trade deals like GATT (1947). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) set global standards, reducing state abuses in many countries.

Our worst traits thrive in bad systems, but good systems—like fair laws or global health campaigns—bring out our best.

The Environment Suffers Too

Greed is wrecking the planet. Overconsumption drives climate change: global CO2 emissions hit 37 billion tons in 2023, up 1.5% from 2022. Deforestation, like in the Amazon (11% lost since 1985), and resource depletion threaten 1 million species with extinction. If everyone lived like the average American, we’d need 5 Earths to sustain us. Yet, global efforts like the Paris Agreement (2015) cut emissions in 70% of signing countries, showing cooperation can fight back.

How We Can Do Better

The good news? We’re not doomed. Here’s how we can improve, with evidence:

  • Education: Teaching kids values like empathy and fairness works. Schools with character education programs see 20% less bullying. Education also boosts economies: every year of schooling increases income by 10% on average.
  • Positive Psychology: Acts of kindness, like volunteering, boost happiness by 15–20%, per studies. Mindfulness practices cut stress in 60% of participants, fostering empathy.
  • Global Cooperation: Post-WWII agreements lifted 1 billion people out of poverty. Tech advances, like AI, could solve problems faster—AI-driven health diagnostics already improve outcomes in 80% of tested cases.
  • Optimism: Optimistic people live 11–15% longer, per a 2019 study, and optimistic leaders inspire progress. Think of movements like Fridays for Future, where youth pushed 100+ countries to act on climate.

Wrapping It Up

Sure, humanity can disappoint. Greed, violence, and lies have caused real harm—look at the 2008 financial crisis, triggered by corporate greed, costing $2 trillion globally, or ongoing wars displacing 100 million people. But that’s not the whole story. We’re also wired for kindness and cooperation, proven by global wins like polio’s near-eradication (99.9% case reduction since 1988) and rising life expectancy (from 31 years in 1800 to 73 today). Our flaws are real, but so is our ability to change. By investing in education, fairness, and teamwork, we can tip the scales toward our better side. It’s not about being perfect—it’s about choosing to do better, together.

References:

* How Can Philosophy Help Us Understand Human Nature?
* The Evolution of Cooperation and the Paradox of Altruism.
* Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality.
* Conflict theory.

Ivanovich Gurdjieff: Profile, life and teachings

Gurdjieff

G.I. Gurdjieff:
The Paradox of a Spiritual Trickster

Mystic, manipulator, philosopher, and provocateur — the enigma of Gurdjieff lives on in contradiction.

Introduction: The Enigmatic Master

George Ivanovich Gurdjieff (c. 1866–1949) was many things: a spiritual teacher, a mystic, a charlatan to some, and a savior to others. He walked the tightrope between prophet and con artist, saint and sensualist. To understand Gurdjieff is to embrace paradox, for his life and teachings refuse the comfort of consistency. He taught that we are asleep, living our lives mechanically, and that true awakening requires shock, suffering, and relentless inner work.

Gurdjieff offered no easy enlightenment. His was a path of fire.

1. The Mysterious Origins

Gurdjieff was born in Alexandropol (modern-day Gyumri, Armenia), of Greek and Armenian ancestry. By his own account, he spent years wandering Central Asia, Tibet, the Middle East, and North Africa in search of ancient knowledge. He claimed to have found hidden esoteric brotherhoods and sacred science. Whether this is fact or myth remains debated — but the man who emerged in Moscow around 1912 was already a formidable force.

When he entered the Russian scene, Gurdjieff was not a beggar-mystic. He arrived with immense personal wealth, collections of rare carpets and cloisonné, and a project he called “The Work.”

2. The Fourth Way: A Different Path

Unlike monks, yogis, or fakirs, Gurdjieff’s “Fourth Way” required no monastery or cave. It was designed for those in everyday life — bankers, bakers, actors, mothers. But the demand was immense: constant self-observation, voluntary suffering, and conscious labor.

He divided man into three centers: intellectual, emotional, and physical. All must work in harmony. He declared that man does not possess a true “I” — he is a multiplicity of competing selves. Only through the Work can one crystallize the real “I.”

“You are not one. You are many.”

3. Beelzebub’s Tales: Fiction as Transmission

Perhaps Gurdjieff’s most confounding creation is Beelzebub’s Tales to His Grandson, the first in his trilogy All and Everything. In this allegorical novel, the demon Beelzebub tells his grandson about humanity’s failures across the ages.

Written in dense, awkward, intentionally difficult prose, Gurdjieff insisted the book must be read aloud, three times:

  • Once for the head
  • Once for the heart
  • Once for the essence

Key concepts include:

  • The cosmic implant called Kundabuffer, which reversed human perception
  • The degeneration of sacred traditions
  • The sevenfold and threefold cosmic laws

“I have buried in this book all that a man must know. But only he who has the key will be able to unlock it.”

4. Sex and the Sacred Beast

Gurdjieff’s views on sexuality were anything but Victorian. He considered sex sacred, the most potent energy in the human machine. Misused, it becomes obsession. Transmuted, it can fuel awakening.

  • He condemned masturbation, contraception, and homosexuality as unnatural.
  • Yet he fathered many children, often with his own female disciples.
  • At times celibate, at times sexually prolific.

He used sexuality both as spiritual leverage and a mirror for mechanical habit.

5. Money: The Despised Tool of Revelation

When Gurdjieff arrived in Russia, he had already amassed a fortune. He detested money, calling it a “maleficent force” that corrupts the soul. Yet he demanded large sums from students.

  • Charged 1,000 rubles per year in early St. Petersburg groups
  • Used money as a psychological wedge: “Nothing reveals a man more than his attitude toward money.”
  • Lost everything in the Russian Revolution

Gurdjieff said he used money not for greed but as a teaching device. Money was just one of his many mirrors.

6. Meals, Music, Alcohol, and Madness: The Method in the Chaos

Gurdjieff conducted much of his teaching at the dinner table. Lavish, vodka-soaked meals turned into psychological confrontations. Alcohol was not an indulgence but often an experiment. Gurdjieff tested how students behaved under the influence. Could they remain conscious, or would they slip into mechanical habits? The toasts, often numbering in the dozens, became ritualized exercises in presence.

He created rituals, movements, and sacred dances. Music played a huge part in his work — composed often with Thomas de Hartmann, his harmonium-driven melodies aimed at awakening inner centers.

“Only he who has suffered the bitterness of truth can receive the sweetness of awakening.”

7. The Last Hour: Death as a Teacher

In his later years, Gurdjieff introduced a powerful exercise: The Last Hour of Life.

“Imagine this is your final hour. What did you do with it?”

This wasn’t morbid fantasy. It was a call to presence. Real living meant preparing for real death.

“If you will not be satisfied with the last hour of your life, you will not be happy about the whole of your life.”

8. The Trickster Sage

Gurdjieff called himself the “unique idiot.” He mocked spiritual pretension. He used every means: laughter, lust, music, humiliation, silence.

“To become conscious is to suffer. To awaken is to pay.”

He didn’t want obedient disciples. He wanted warriors of the spirit.

Conclusion: Still a Riddle

Gurdjieff died in 1949 in Paris, surrounded by students. He gave final toasts, smoked his last cigarette, and received visitors until the very end. In the words of his pupils, “He died like a king.” Composed, deliberate, fully aware.

To this day, people argue over who he really was: a prophet or a charlatan? A sexual manipulator or a tantric adept? A truth-teller or a myth-maker?

The only honest answer is: yes. He was all of these. But those who truly seek him will find what he always pointed to:

“The real man is not born. He must be made.”

Suggested Reading & Resources

  • Beelzebub’s Tales to His Grandson by G.I. Gurdjieff
  • Meetings with Remarkable Men
  • Views from the Real World
  • Gurdjieff: Making a New World by J.G. Bennett
  • The Gurdjieff Journal (www.gurdjieff-legacy.org)