Tukaram Mundhe’s Enforcement Drive in Maharashtra
Food safety in India is another governance crisis in India. The laws have been changed, rules have been changed and a new generation of officers have taken over but the structure of the different departments remain same.
The unfortunate reality of food safety departments across the country is that they often operate on a cycle of “performative enforcement.” We see a sudden burst of activity right before a major festival like Diwali or Holy. A few highly publicized raids on sweet shops, some samples collected, and a couple of headlines. After that the department goes completely dark for the next six months
The Rotten Ecosystem
Food safety enforcement in India does not just fail. It actively serves the failure. The problem is not a lack of laws. The Food Safety and Standards Act exists. Regulations are in place. The FDA has officers, jurisdiction, and power. The entire enforcement structure looks perfect on paper.
When an administrative office possesses “royal character,” the rules cease to be a standard for public welfare and instead become a private inheritance of power. Subjects exist to pay tribute not to obey rules.
Thus, a tribute economy exists beneath the paper. Inspectors receive fixed geographical territories. These territories soon become personal estates. Assigning an inspector a fixed geographical territory turns that area into a private fiefdom. The relationship between the inspector and the vendors isn’t regulatory; it’s feudal. Inspectors do not want to shut down dirty kitchens. Doing so would destroy their revenue. Instead, they create a quiet arrangement.
Large operators pay monthly bribes for immunity. Inspectors target small vendors for minor violations. They issue fines for a missing hairnet or an unlabelled jar. This creates fake statistics of compliance. Supervisors remain satisfied.
The vendor pays the fine. The case goes to court. A small penalty is paid. Business then resumes as usual. The fine is not a deterrent. It is simply a tax with a government receipt. Adulterated food and synthetic milk keep flowing. The monthly bribe collection rolls in. This is not corruption as an exception. It is corruption by design.
This is why when one honest officer shakes Maharashtra, we cheer for him. But that should alarm us more than comfort us.
The Hero We Deserve, the System We Don’t
Tukaram Mundhe is the kind of officer India loves to celebrate. He took charge as Maharashtra’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner in May 2026. Within weeks, he launched a massive campaign. He raided synthetic milk networks. He shut down adulteration units and arrested hundreds. His team suspended the licences of iconic Mumbai eateries. These included the 73-year-old K. Rustom and Co. at Marine Drive. They also suspended the Noor Mohammadi Hotel in Bhendi Bazar.
Dairy farmers spilled litres of synthetic milk out of fear. The state’s food industry panicked. The public cheered. Social media celebrated him as a crusader. This applause is well deserved. However, a deeper question remains. What does it mean when a system requires a hero to function? The answer is damning. We cannot solve this by finding more heroes.
The Court Sitting on a Heap of Garbage
One image captures how desensitised the system is. Picture a municipal court in Karol Bagh Delhi, hearing hygiene cases. Its entrance, corridors, and parking lot are buried under garbage. The hygiene court sits on the evidence of its failure. This is not just irony. It is a confession.
Enforcement has become a procedural ritual. Officials file cases and issue fines. They schedule endless hearings. Meanwhile, the trash piles higher. Adulteration networks run smoothly. The system still congratulates itself.
The courts complete this broken loop. Prosecuted cases drag on for fifteen years. By then, the public forgets the crime. The business simply changes its name. The deterrent effect evaporates. The law loses its power through slow, grinding failures.
The Inspector as King
The worst part of Inspector Raj is not the bribe. It is the power to punish without cause. Fixed territories give inspectors royal power. They collect tribute from compliant businesses. They also punish those who resist.
A neighbour can use an inspector to settle a score. The inspector files a fabricated charge. An innocent citizen becomes an accused. The citizen is often intimidated by the system. They do not want to spend weeks in court. Most citizens plead guilty and pay the fine. The inspector wins. The score is settled.
Sometimes, a citizen fights back. They refuse to plead guilty and demand a trial. This immediately exposes the inspector’s bluff. The inspector has no evidence. He simply does not show up in court. The magistrate dismisses the case.
The citizen is vindicated. However, the citizen still loses time and energy. The system is designed to exhaust you. Worse, the magistrate does not punish the inspector. No warrants are issued. No malicious prosecution charges are filed. The court quietly closes the file. The inspector faces no consequences. The bench and the bureaucracy share an invisible handshake. The public servant always outranks the citizen.
The Colonial Root
India spent centuries under foreign rule. The administrative machinery belonged to the rulers. Rules were written to extract wealth, not to protect citizens. In that environment, outsmarting the system meant survival. A corrupt local official acted as a buffer. His bribes neutralised alien decrees. Bribery was how communities bought back their freedom.
Independence came, but the mindset did not reset. The relationship between citizen and state remained adversarial. We inherited the colonial structure without major changes. We kept the same paperwork and top-down control. The public responded in the same old way.
This created a deep civilisational contradiction. Citizens treat their own state like an occupying power. They see rules as weapons used for extortion. Bypassing rules is still viewed as survival. More regulations cannot cure this rot. More rules just give inspectors more leverage. The cycle feeds itself.
What Tukaram Mundhe Can and Cannot Do
Mundhe is genuinely exceptional. He refuses to participate in the bribe network. This forces his inspectors to do their jobs. When leadership does not collect, the network collapses.
However, his impact depends entirely on his presence. He will eventually be transferred. He has faced 25 transfers in 21 years. When he leaves, the system will reset. Farmers will resume making synthetic milk. Collection routes will start again. Eateries will reopen using old channels.
One honest officer cannot fix a broken design. He can shake the system. He cannot transform it. The hero is real. The need for a hero is the real failure.
The Solution: Three Interlocking Shifts
We do not need more enforcement. We need to redesign the system itself.
1. Self-Regulation as the Default
The current model assumes guilt. Businesses need constant permissions just to exist. Each permission is a chance for extortion. We must reverse this assumption. We must trust first and verify later. Businesses should declare compliance and operate freely. The inspector becomes an auditor, not a gatekeeper. This does not eliminate oversight. It removes daily contact between inspectors and businesses.
2. Randomised Surprise Audits (Not Fixed Territories)
We must replace fixed territories with randomised audits. This change achieves two goals. First, it destroys the inspector’s private estate. Inspectors will have no fixed territory to exploit. They cannot establish regular bribe networks. Second, it restores unpredictability. Violators will not know when an audit is coming. We must embed this fear into the system design. Let computer assign areas randomly to each auditor. Assign each establishment a computer code. Feed data into system. Data will speak itself.
3. Swift Trial and Speedy Justice
Long trials ruin the deterrent effect. Adulterers know trials drag on for fifteen years. They treat small court fines as business expenses. Punishment must be swift and severe. We need immediate licence suspensions. for food business suspension of one day is big deterrent. But this must be in exceptional circumstances. Better name and shame violators. Assets should be seized for repeat offenders. Serious offenders must face permanent bans. Five violation and forfeit right to be near any food business.
These penalties should be applied administratively. They must be enforced during the appeal process. When penalties are instant, compliance becomes the only option.
4. The Open Debate That Must Precede All of This
Structural changes require a cultural shift. We must confront our tolerance for compromise. We have romanticised quick workarounds for too long. We mock law-abiding citizens as naive. Our societal baseline is a casual acceptance of low quality. This baseline must be challenged.
We need an open, honest public debate. We must see compromise as self-harm. Synthetic milk poisons our own children. Only a change in mindset makes self-regulation work. Social pressure will enforce rules better than corrupt inspectors.
Bottom Line
Tukaram Mundhe deserves our praise. His fearlessness is rare and important. However, the real story is about the system. One honest officer produced results that thousands of rules could not.
We cannot rely on finding more heroes. We must build a system that works without them. The design itself must enforce compliance. Punishments must be swift and real. The citizen must be a stakeholder, not a subject. Until then, we will keep celebrating heroes. The system will keep failing.
References: