Brutal Conduct in Africa
The British need no provocation for their conduct. They are what they are: inhuman.
Britain is an island state. Its northern area consists of Scotland and part of Ireland. Except for the southern area, most of the land is not suited for agriculture due to cold weather. Hence, it is dependent on imports for its essential supplies. Therefore, developing protected shipping lanes was an imperative choice.
The last 400 years saw European nations, especially Britain, dominate world trade. Starting their introduction as traders, they gradually occupied foreign lands and subjugated them. It was the same playbook they applied in India.
Human Traffic
As an island state, in a pre-industrial economy it had limited avenues for production. Thus, Britain became a major participant in the transatlantic slave trade from the 16th to the early 19th century. British ships and companies (notably the Royal African Company) transported an estimated 3+ million enslaved Africans to the Americas.
Their main business was buying enslaved people from African rulers, middlemen, and traders in exchange for European goods (wool, guns, metalware, alcohol, etc.). Later, textiles imported from India (“Calicoes”) became part of this trade.
The Royal African Company (RAC) was an English (later British) chartered trading company. It dominated England’s commerce with West Africa in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. But its central role was the transatlantic slave trade.
The RAC was established in 1672 under a royal charter granted by King Charles II. It succeeded earlier companies, including the Company of Royal Adventurers Trading into Africa (founded in the 1660s). The Duke of York (later King James II) was a major investor in the company. Thus, it had strong royal and aristocratic backing. It held a monopoly on English trade with West Africa (roughly from Cape Blanco to the Cape of Good Hope).
Between 1672 and 1731, the RAC organized or invested in ships that carried an estimated 186,000+ enslaved people to English colonies, mostly in the Americas (mainly the Caribbean, especially Barbados and Jamaica, and some to North America). More than 16,000 human beings died during these trafficking voyages.
The enslaved people were often branded with the company’s initials (“RAC”) or the mark of the Duke of York (“DoY”) for identification. The company maintained fortified trading posts or castles and factories on the West African coast. One major post was at the Gold Coast (modern Ghana), where captives were held before shipment.
In 1698, Parliament ended the RAC’s legal monopoly under pressure from private traders who wanted access to the African trade. Gradually, the business of the RAC declined. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 through the Slave Trade Act and prohibited slavery throughout most of the empire in 1833–34.
The end of the slave trade opened new vistas for Britain, and it turned towards East Africa and its vast resources.
Africa
In 1886, Britain and Germany entered into an agreement to divide East Africa among themselves. Britain appropriated the area north of a line roughly corresponding to today’s Kenya–Tanzania border. The Sultan of Zanzibar retained a narrow 10-mile (16 km) coastal strip.
There was an uprising among the local population as soon as they realized what the British intended to do: the extraction of resources. Various communities resisted colonial occupation, including the Nandi, Kikuyu, Bukusu, and others. The British prevailed over all. However, the Mau Mau or Kenya Land and Freedom Army rebellion of the 1950s was the fiercest. It was largely Kikuyu-led, combining guerrilla warfare with demands over land and independence.
Kenya: The Pipeline and the Cover-Up
The Mau Mau uprising in Kenya was suppressed by the British by subjecting the natives to torture in concentration camps. This became the most thoroughly documented torture of the 20th century.
The colonial administration established a network of detention facilities across Kenya known internally as The Pipeline. Over 1.5 million Kikuyu civilians were interned across this network.
Detainees inside The Pipeline were subjected to systematic torture. Documented methods included castration, severe beatings, electric shocks applied to genitals and other sensitive areas, sexual violence, and prolonged forced labor under harsh conditions. These were not the actions of rogue officers; they were systematic and supervised. Historian Caroline Elkins documented these atrocities in her 2005 Pulitzer Prize-winning book, Britain’s Gulag. Her research drew directly from survivor accounts and colonial records.
Before leaving Kenya, British colonial officials organized what they called Operation Legacy. They burned thousands of colonial records. They weighted crates of documents and dropped them into the ocean to remove evidence of what had been done. The operation was not discovered through voluntary disclosure; it emerged through legal proceedings in British courts. Surviving Mau Mau victims sued the British government, and the litigation exposed both the hidden records and the systematic attempt to destroy them.
In 2013, after years of legal battle, the British High Court ordered compensation to surviving victims. The British government issued an official statement of regret. It was not an apology. The language was chosen precisely to avoid legal admission of liability. The cover-up itself is part of the historical record of institutional failure.
The Documentation
The key documents recording the atrocities of the British are known as the “migrated archives” or Hanslope files.
These are thousands of sensitive colonial-era files (including many from Kenya) that British officials removed from Kenya shortly before independence in 1963 because they were likely to “embarrass Her Majesty’s Government.”
For decades, they were stored secretly at Hanslope Park, a high-security Foreign Office facility in Buckinghamshire, England, which also houses offices of the intelligence service. The existence of these documents was repeatedly denied. They came to light in 2011 during a High Court case in London brought by elderly Kenyan survivors seeking compensation for torture and abuse in detention camps.
Historians (notably David Anderson) and lawyers forced the Foreign Office to locate and disclose them. After the court case, the Kenya-related files (and others from 37 former colonies) were transferred to The National Archives (TNA) at Kew, south-west London. Researchers, historians, and the public can consult these documents today as per rules of access.
References:
-
Elkins, Caroline. Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya (published in the UK as Britain’s Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya). Henry Holt / Jonathan Cape, 2005. ISBN: 0-8050-8001-5. (Winner of the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction).
-
Anderson, David. Histories of the Hanged: The Dirty War in Kenya and the End of Empire. W.W. Norton & Company, 2005. ISBN: 978-0393059861. (Key academic research exposing the scale of executions and detention during the Mau Mau uprising).
-
Mutua and Others v. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. UK High Court of Justice, London (2011–2013). Official court proceedings resulting in the disclosure of the Hanslope Park “migrated archives” and the £19.9 million compensation settlement for Kenyan survivors.
-
The National Archives (TNA), Kew. Migrated Archives Record Series (FCO 141). Formerly secret colonial administration files from 37 former colonies, released following the 2011 High Court ruling.
-
SlaveVoyages (The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database). Hosted by Rice University, Emory University, and the Hutchins Center at Harvard University. Online database: https://www.slavevoyages.org (Documenting details of over 36,000 individual slaving voyages and confirming British ships transported over 3.4 million enslaved Africans).
-
Pettigrew, William A. Freedom’s Debt: The Royal African Company and the Politics of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1672–1752. University of North Carolina Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-1469611815. (The primary academic history documenting the RAC’s royal charter under Charles II, its trafficking of 186,000+ enslaved people, and the branding of captives).
-
Eltis, David and Richardson, David. Atlas of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Yale University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0300124606. (The definitive statistical record confirming that British ships transported over 3.4 million enslaved Africans between 1640 and 1807).